Other "Thinking Drafts" and writing by Keith Drury --
http://www.indwes.edu/tuesday .
From: Kssmucker@aol.com To: kdrury@dorcas.indwes.edu Subject: Re: E. coli Churches (Tuesday Column) Good column (is that what it's called on e-mail?) The question that comes to mind is: should the church that has been infected by E. Coli change names? I'm not sure that's the best way for God's grace to work. Thanks. Good to read your comments again. Karen S. Smucker To: Keith DruryWhat on earth does the fact that Hillary Clinton is friends with Don Tyson have to do with E-Coli? Or, that Tyson bought the distressed Hudson Foods Corporation? Or, that Hudson is both the name of a defunct car maker and failed food company. Sorry, but you missed me on this one. I give you 2 on a scale of 1-10, Hillary bashing takes away points. Not to mention, my cousin Harvey in Pea Ridge Arkansas has faithfully driven a chicken truck for Hudson for a number of years. Most corporations are made up of people like Harvey, honest and hard working. Hopefully, white knight Tyson will help keep him and others employed and thus avert a disaster in small town USA. -- J. Doug Dawson Broken Arrow, OK From: "James J Lake" I`m so glad you are back at it again.Hope you had a marvelous summer. I think some good names for churches today could be The Family of Faith Church, The Neighbor Fellowship Church, The Friendship Chapel Of Faith, Accountability Christian Center and The Spiritual Fitness Tabernacle. What ever we call them is not as important as what takes place in them. If lives are not being radically transformed by the grace of God then we should just call it : The Country Club Cathedral of Show up and Go Through The Motions. The Royal Family has been recently accused of being too cold ,too slow to act and totally out of touch with people who needed to see some compassion, emotion and warmth . The Church needs to throw off the E. coli of the past and step up to the plate and demonstrate in very healthy and practical ways that she has been healed and is now ready to bring healing to the nations. Thanks Keith for the spiritual health you bring to my life--Jim-- From: RJAJ4@aol.com My first church was like that. I went calling in the neighborhood next to the church door-to-door, what did people remember? A church that was so loud with guitars and drums that they could hear blocks away. They remembered people marching around the church, they were offended. I was there 10 years later and that is still how they looked at the church even though we were a completely different group. We moved but kept the name. I don't know if the name needs to be changed or the people in some cases. Usually you have to find a new location, get in some new people, and change the name if the community is too small. Yep, carnality can really be a mess sometimes. My present location started from some folk pulling out of a liberal Methodist Church. How has the church grown. Either new folk or folk from other communities around us. What do the older folk in town think of us, not much. That was over 30 years ago! When I first moved here I met with the local Ecu. council. The Methodist preacher said, "oh your the ones!". That was 20 years after and he wasn't even preaching around here at the time. Yep sometimes change of address, name, and in some cases people is necessary. From: BLK130 Mr. Drury, Your article on E-coli in the church certainly hit a nerve with me. This very thing happened to my home church when I was teenager. The church was located in a small town (12,000) and thirty years later healing is finally starting to happen. Would I have wanted to be the pastor that came in after the split and try to teach love? I don't think so! None of the pastors had the slightest idea how to do reconciliation. I doubt the subject of what to do with "untouchable" churches is taught in seminary. Ironically I wonder how many "good" churches there really are? As a teenager that experienced this abandonment I can tell you it has taken me years to come to terms with the way the church handled the situation. The pastors had no idea how to minister to the hurting families. The kids were rejected, although they were not in any way guilty. Many of the churches in our area have taken holiness out of their church descriptions. Holiness seems to imply much work and little grace. I don't think John Wesley ever intended that the two be separated, they work together in a rhymn. However, this generation seems to want an easy religion. More grace, less work. Also, the big thing is now "mission" statements. I was surprised at how many have removed Jesus Christ from that statement. Jesus is a good model but His deity is not always accepted. --Barbara From: Bud Bence Change the name? Perhaps a good idea. But like ValuJet, the danger is that the product is the same under a new label. Several churches have decided to drop their denominational moniker and become "community" churches. But unless the new name is backed by a new way of seeing things and doing things, nothing has really changed. A rose (or a stinkweed) by any other name..... Dr. Bud Bence Keith Someone sent me your article about e-coli in churches. At the beginning, you made several reference's to Hudson Foods. While it is true that Hudson Foods has been sold to Tyson, pending regulator approval, perhaps you are unaware that the plant in Nebraska was sold to IBP several days ago, before the sale to Tyson. Hudson also, several years ago, sold some packing plants in Wichita, Kansas. The sale of the plants allowed Hudson to concentrate on the poultry operations, chicken and turkey. The sale to Tyson came after many months of discussion, which began long before the recall. Many people in Northwest Arkansas fully support Hudson Foods in the recall action, and feel the company has been wronged by Burger King when Burger King canceled the beef contract. Burger King could have simply told people that they knew how to cook hamburgers, they did in fact several years ago have special training on how long and at what temperature to cook a hamburger. It is interesting to note that the e-coli scare was only in the state of Colorado. Hudson Foods has a high standard of ethics, often doing more than is required, because they want to do the right thing. The employees at the closed plant in Nebraska still draw a paycheck each week at a cost, I believe of around 300 thousand a week. How many other large companies would do that. These employees are idled, not producing anything. Not long ago, Red Hudson helped save a housing development by asking a couple friends to join him in putting up a million dollars each. Red does many things to help out the Northwest area of Arkansas, JB Hunt truck line would not be what it is today without Red Hudson. While Tyson, Hunt, and Walton are the names most often called the big three in Arkansas, Hudson worked in the background. Red Hudson is down but not out, he will move his office down the road about a mile to a plastic's company he acquired a while back. I believe you are mistaken when you say the Hudson name joins the Hudson automobile in the auto graveyards. You will see the name Hudson associated with some other product, perhaps even poultry after a non-compete clause expires. I am not, nor have I ever been, a Hudson employee or stockholder. The same can be said about the other companies I have mentioned. I am, however a resident in Northwest Arkansas, moving here from the Wichita, Kansas area. While living in Kansas I was an active member of a church with a long history of problems. In fact, as an elder, I even signed a letter asking the pastor to resign. After about a year, we began the call process. We had no problem getting a new pastor. We were open about the past, the church today has grown, added on to the building and is on solid ground. In your article, you made mention of a pastor that returned a call because of problems ten years prior. If that was indeed the case, perhaps that pastor might want to review his calling to be a pastor. In ten years, most things die down, wounds are healed. Some members may have moved away. Yours Arnold Nobles anobles@ipa.net From: tsmith@Perigee.net (Tim Smith) A delight to see that at least occasionally we will be treated to a Tuesday gem. The name-change won't do it if the character change doesn't also happen. the name you use ought to depend on the crowd you want to reach. If you are a church for Christians (and there's nothing wrong with that) Wesleyan or Methodist or Holiness or pentecostal or Baptist will do. If you're a church for sinners, the more nuetral the better. They won't come or stay away because of the name so the more neutral, the better. And then there's the "Mr. Salty" theory! Tim From: Dick Wynn <76511.2757@compuserve.com Hi Keith...I am glad it is fall and you are back in the saddle. I for sure like the concept of "community" in the name of a church. Sometimes what we think are distinctives are only obstacles to the non-churched or the used-to-be- churched. --Dick Wynn
So what do you think?
To contribute to the thinking on this issue e-mail your response to
Tuesday@indwes.eduBy Keith Drury, 1997. You are free to transmit, duplicate or distribute this article for non-profit use without permission.