6

Pilgrim Holiness Church: 1930-1935

Consolidation and Centralization

 

Pilgrims started out as a collection of like-minded people in a “union” called the International Holiness Union and Prayer League.  They were more like an ecumenical para-church movement than a denomination. Gradually through the teens and 20’s they began to take on the trappings of a more centralized denomination as they absorbed smaller holiness bodies. However, if we had to pick a single date when the Pilgrims got their denominational act unified it would be 1930 at the General Assembly held the first week of September in Frankfort, Indiana. 

 

Just eleven months after the great stock market crash of 1929 the Pilgrims gathered in Frankfort. Unemployment was soaring and many Americans were ready for drastic moves that would batten the hatches for the looming storm ahead of the depression. In that emergency atmosphere Pilgrims seemed ready to try something new and more centralized. The change would come hard and not without its failures.

 

The situation in 1930

Pilgrims naturally resisted centralized oversight and authority. Believing the Holy Spirit called each person to their work, they seldom asked permission to do anything. Missionaries raised their own funds and started their own mission fields wherever God had called them.  Some became Pilgrim fields; others joined other denominations or stayed independent. Evangelists roved the nation holding tent meetings leaving behind newly planted churches which they sometimes bequeathed to Pilgrims and sometimes gave to other denominations or just walked away leaving the fledgling congregation to themselves. When pastors or regional leaders saw the need for orphanages, city missions or Bible schools they simply organized them in obedience to the Spirit without asking permission of anybody. Denominational leaders were being elected but few people felt restrained by them in any way since they “answered to God alone.”  Sectionalism and individualism prevailed. Before 1930 one could argue that the Pilgrims were not much more than a collection of several denominations and independent works, a movement, more than a unified denomination.[1]

 

Before the 1930 Assembly there were three General Superintendents—two for the homeland work (the aging Seth Cook Rees and W. R. Cox) and a third General Superintendent (R. G. Finch) for foreign missions. They worked largely independent from each other and didn’t even live in the same towns. There were nine—nine!—General Boards which operated independently from each other, including a separate board for Foreign Missions, Home missions, Publications, Education, along with four other boards plus a “General Council” which exercised little actual authority over all the other boards. There were two official headquarters (Kingswood, Kentucky and Cincinnati, Ohio) but in practice there were really four since the homeland GSs operated from Greensboro, NC and Pasadena, California. Financing the general church work was a challenge. Each entity was left to raise its own funds by appeals, so the ones who could make the best appeal got the most money.

 

Given the Pilgrim’s high value on missionary work[2], the board of Foreign missions raised the most money—many times as much as all the stateside work combined, and a large amount of the stateside money went to “home missions.” It was virtually impossible to raise money for the $2500 salary of the homeland GSs. They were left to preach at camp meetings and hold revivals to support themselves. Knapp’s “Faith principle” along with the “Voluntary principle” dominated Pilgrim thinking so they resisted any attempt to “tax” churches or members. A meager attempt had been made in 1922 to urge churches to voluntarily contribute 25 cents per member to support the stateside GSs, but even that flopped. Pilgrims preferred to give their quarter to missions.

 

The new unified plan

In 1930 a new unified plan for supporting the general work of the Pilgrims was hatched. It proposed unifying the general church work into a single budget that would support all the work (including missions) and it would end all competitive appeals for funds. Paul Thomas, author of the official Pilgrim history, likened the situation to the original thirteen colonies—each operating independently from the other insisting on a weak federal government that would not infringe on “states rights.” Pilgrims were great givers—but they liked to give where they saw the need, not on the basis of some centralized taxation system. The new plan would turn out to be somewhat of an organizational success but it would be a colossal financial failure.

 

Pilgrims already believed there was one Lord, one faith and one baptism. They now implemented a plan to also have one General Superintendent, one general board, one headquarters and one general budget. The one General Superintendent would be over all the work—both foreign and stateside, the one general board would supervise all the work, the one headquarters would be in Indianapolis[3] and the and one general budget would support all foreign and stateside work and be divided by the board using a percentage allocation. The 76 year-old Rees was elected as the single GS.

 

The plan was adopted but not without opposition. Advocates of missions saw the scheme as an attempt by denominational administrators to get their hands into the missions cookie jar. Others saw it as crass centralization of power[4]. But the measure passed eventually and all competitive special appeals ended.  So did giving. The unified budget was based on the cherished voluntary principle so each church was supposed to voluntarily pledge an amount and the district was to combine those pledges as the district’s pledge to the general work. Pilgrims were accustomed to emergency appeals, so many simply quit giving to the general work. It was, after all, depression times. The new headquarters in Indianapolis was first located in a residential house that was rented for $35 a month. Even when it soon moved to a larger house, several general leaders’ families[5] lived in the house to help pay the rent. General board members paid their own expenses to the first meeting, and slept on cots in a large attic room of the headquarters-house, relying on local Pilgrim churches to provide something for them to eat during the meetings.

 

A worldwide depression, combined with the confusion generated by the new unified plan made the money dry up. On top of all this, the aging Seth Rees, now the singular General Superintendent, spent little time around the new headquarters and the newly elected Treasurer (Harry Hays) could not keep books.[6] The financial part of the plan collapsed and the general leaders eventually revoked it returning the church to separate and competitive money appeals. The lasting effect, however, was organizational—the Pilgrims now had a single headquarters, a single General Superintendent, and a single general board managing the general work.

 

Death of Rees

Just three years after the eventful conference in 1930 Seth Rees died (May 22, 1933). The white-haired warrior-saint was venerated among Pilgrims now far more than his forgotten partner in founding the church, (Martin Wells Knapp).[7] He was remembered at his death as a man of missionary fervor and preacher more than denominational leader or administrator. Rees’ successor as solo-General Superintendent (filling out his unexpired term) would be Walter L. Surbrook[8] a young Michigan native in his early 40’s. The new financial plan had shipwrecked but the unified centralized organizational structure survived. The restructuring had left some out of a job, most notably the zealous and dedicated R. G. Finch who had been a General Superintendent over foreign Missions for eight years (1922-1930). Having turned Finch out of office in the reorganization, the denomination then created a new category for him called “General Evangelist.” Finch eventually settled in Colorado Spring where in the late 1930’s he would become the focus of the Pilgrim’s own “Pasadena incident”–only this time the incident would occur in Colorado Springs and shoe would be on the other foot for denominational leaders.

 

To think about….

  1. Are movements destined to become structured and centralized as time passes? What are examples of other connectional movements that eventually structured into centralized denominations? How did a similar consolidation from connectionalism happen among the Wesleyan Methodists? Can you think of examples of denominations that still retain their “connectional” structures today?
  2. What are some disadvantages of decentralized independent connectionalism? Advantages?
  3. What do you think of the competitive fund-raising approach where “each tub sits on its own bottom?” Which of the following are you willing to apply such a plan to: General church offices? Missions? District Camps? Local church programs? Do your views differ for different levels? If so, Why?
  4. In times of national crisis like the stock market crash and the Great Depression are leaders sometimes tempted to use the emergency as an excuse to initiate restructuring they already had in mind? Concerning the economic crisis of 2009, economist Paul Romer (of Stanford), said “Never letting a good crisis go to waste” (also attributed to Tom Friedman). Have you ever observed leaders respond to an “emergency” by actions that may have been in their mind all along and the crisis gave them an excuse to act? Describe the situation and your take on it.
  5. Do you think missionary funds should always be raised on a voluntary basis or is it okay to “tax” churches for missionary outreach?  What about educational funds?  Why or why not?
  6. If you were a denominational leader and “The people” elected someone (like Harry Hays) to fill a post they were not competent to fill, how would you handle the situation? Would you recruit someone to do it for them and leave them in office because they were elected by the people? Would you try to persuade them to resign? Would you go so far as to try to remove them by board action if they refused to resign? Would you act differently in the local church than the district or general church? Why or why not?

 

So what do you think?

During the first few weeks, click here to comment or read comments

 

Keith Drury   October 13, 2009

 www.TuesdayColumn.com

 



[1] I do not make this argument however but it could be made. Even the official Thomas and Thomas history closes with a membership graph and sure enough, it begins in 1930 –the advent of a unified General Board. Did the Pilgrims look around them at other holiness denominations (The Free Methodists, the Church of the Nazarene, the Wesleyan Methodist Church) and copy their more unified centralized approach? What other factors may have contributed to this seismic change? As it turned out the consolidation of power would be a “liberalizing” influence on the denomination—for in virtually all conflicts afterward to the 1960’s the centralized power would be on the progressive/liberal side of the issue with the conservative or radical or ”legalistic” side constantly pushing against centralized authority.

[2] Concerning the Pilgrims high value on missions:  Rees considered it the primary aim of the church. In a letter to the New York district read into the record in 1933 he said, “One of the chief mistakes of the Pilgrim Holiness Church is that we have made missions and missionary work a department when we should have made it our objective—first, last and always.” However, in the quadrennium ending in 1930 the denomination of 17,400 members had raised a total of just short of $255,000. Of that amount a full 81% of the funds went to foreign missions. Certainly nobody could have complained that missions was not getting a “fair share” of general church giving could they? Indeed, some considered that the homeland ministry was being starved in favor of foreign missions. This may have been at the root of the scheme to unify the budget and the percentages established by the General Board backeds this up—Missions got less and church administration got more. But of course they didn’t—neither got enough since the money dried up as most Pilgrims just waited for the “emergency appeals” they were accustomed to.

[3] Three locations competed for the new central headquarters, Frankfort Indiana (where the Assembly was being held), Kingswood, Kentucky (where the foreign missions headquarters was located), and the neutral location, Indianapolis. Was the defeat of Kingswood as a location an indicator of a mood to “put missions in its place?” (or to put R. G Finch in his place?) since the advocates of that location lost out to Indianapolis?  The GS over the foreign missionary work, R. G. Finch, whose influence dominated the 1926 Assembly seemed to be was waning by 1930 and more moderate leaders considered him “too legalistic”—but more on that in a later story.

[4] Though Franklin D. Roosevelt would not be elected President for two more years (1932) a similar centralization of power and economic activism would prevail in the nation in the 1930’s. Pilgrims were generally opposed to FDR’s approach politically so it is all the more interesting that they accepted a similar nationalization and centralization in the denomination’s economy.

[5] The families of the General Treasurer and General Secretary lived in the church headquarters building and there was also one guest room reserved for aging General Superintendent Rees when he was on location, (which was seldom).

[6] Faced with a bookkeeper who couldn’t keep books, the headquarters recruited Edna Neff, who volunteered her time to hold things together until (within a year) E. V. Halt, a bookkeeper-cum-evangelist was persuaded to join the headquarters as the General Treasurer and Publisher. Halt would serve for the next 36 years and establish what would become a family lineage of denominational service including a later publisher, Raymond Halt (his brother) and still later (after the 1968 merger with the Wesleyan Methodists), Richard Halt (Raymond’s son) who served as Publisher. 

[7] Perhaps this elevation of founder Rees is due partly to Knapp’s early death in 1901. But it may also indicate a growing drifting away from God’s Bible School, cradle of the Pilgrim Holiness Church which nevertheless continued to provide a significant number of Pilgrim missionaries for years to come. God’s Bible School and the Revivalist magazine continued as an independent holiness movement after Knapp’s death. As the Pilgrims gradually organized away from an ecumenical movement into a denomination GBS and the Pilgrims drifted away from each other though the GBS influence as an independent movement continued to influence the denomination for years. Indeed one of the three current General Superintendents (2009) of The Wesleyan Church is an alumnus of GBS, JoAnne Lyon.

[8] Walter Surbrook had graduated from Owosso Bible Holiness Seminary and from the Kingswood Holiness college with the A.B. and B.D. degrees. He later received a Master’s degree from the University of California.  He was a professor at the Pilgrim Bible College in Pasadena before returning to Kingswood where he at first taught then later became the President (1927-1930).  While in the somewhat ingrown community of Kingswood there arose some tensions between Surbrook and R. G. Finch, the GS over Foreign Missions but I have not been able to discover what that tension was. It may be an important root of a later conflict between the two good men.