Vangie
Armiger Response to the R. G. Finch story
I would like to thank Keith Drury
for researching and writing a worthy piece concerning the “Finch dissention”
that occurred within
As a granddaughter of R.G. Finch (I did not
know him since I was born four years after his death) and Ruth Finch (she lived
in my home on several occasions until her death when I was 15), I believe my
grandfather was a natural born leader who tried to fit into the structure and
discipline of a denomination to a point.
However, because he felt he had been unfairly treated (I cannot and will
not try to determine from reading the historical accounts whether he was
treated unfairly or not), he eventually
succumbed to his "need to lead" that most natural born leaders
seem to succumb to in order to remain legitimate as a person and fulfill their
calling. Some leaders, especially religious leaders, find another outlet to
lead within the "system," but others reject the existing system
entirely and create their own. Why else
would there be so many denominations, splinter groups, independent churches,
and parachurch organizations since the Protestant Reformation?
In order to legitimize their existence,
each of these denominations or groups perpetuate some "peculiar"
reason or reasons to exist, whether or not other people and/or history deem
these reasons legitimate or not; the first generation seems to understand these
"peculiarities," but future generations often become confused and
disillusioned concerning the all-consuming reasons to "separate" from
an existing denomination or group and "begin" a more enlightened
one. What one generation views as “the
will of God” is often viewed as “petty and ridiculous” or even “sinful” by
later generations. Next generation
judging often becomes vindictive and petty itself, however, and it behooves
every Christian to thoughtfully and prayerfully discern if, what, and why
certain beliefs and practices need to be corrected or changed. Change, simply for the sake of change, often
leads to disastrous results that take many generations or yet another “splinter
group” to repair the mistakes made in being either progressive or protective
thinkers.
In American history, of course, such
thinking dates back to the time of the "Separatists" of England, who
felt that to remain true to their religious beliefs, they must
"separate" from the King's church; this group eventually became known
as the Pigrims, that is the Pilgrims of 1620, Plymouth Rock, Mayflower, and the
first Thanksgiving with the Wampanoag Indian tribe of Massachusetts fame; these
are not the Pilgims of Pilgrim Holiness Church fame, though those who were
brought up in this church were often asked if our church ancestors came over on
the Mayflower. On the other hand, the
English Puritans did not wish to "separate" from the Church of
England of their day, but to "purify" it. Of course, it was true then as it is true
now, that existing denominations, groups, and even independent churches don't
always take kindly to the notion that they need "purified." Both the Pilgrims and Puritans changed
American history and the history of the world forever, despite their reasons
for coming to a new land seeking religious freedom.
Thus, in a country of "religious
freedom" such as the United States, there have always been and will
continue to be smaller groups of grieved, disgruntled, and perhaps more
independent minded people who disagree with what is happening in their
"church" or denominations; someone with natural leadership abilities
will "lead" these people away from the existing church to begin a
more "enlightened, spiritual, scripturally pure, or progressive” church,
depending on the debated subject and the leader’s strength . Other grieved, disgruntled, and or
independent minded individuals will try to "purify" or perhaps
"enlighten" their given churches while remaining in them. Unless all Christians around the world
rise up to unite and organize a new and yet original "Catholic Church, “I
believe that Jesus, the head of the invisible "Church," will use all
kinds of denominations, splinter groups, independent churches, or whatever we
may call ourselves to "go into all the world and make disciples, baptizing
them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
As the youngest daughter of J. R. and
Naomi Finch Mitchell, I often heard the stories of how my mother's father, R.
G. Finch, began a new church and how it hurt a lot of people in the process,
including my immediate family. I knew my
father and mother originally left the
I thank the Lord for men like Keith
Drury's father who welcomed my father and others like him back into the
Although history proves that merger sometimes creates a more
"liberal" church than the original churches, my father believed, as
do I, this does not need to be the case. It is possible that "laying all the cards
on the table" or "starting from scratch" in the process of
creating a merged church allows leaders of original churches to retain that which is eternally,
scripturally, and culturally important for the proclamation of the Gospel and
at the same time eliminate that
which is not; perhaps, even more importantly, the merging of one or more
denominations may actually force the original groups to rethink and/or reclaim
beliefs, practices, and behaviors that they had allowed to slip away through
pressure and democratic voting of their members over the years. Although this is not often done, there is no
reason it cannot and should not be done.
As Christians together, however, and
because of or despite our religious affiliations and peculiarities, the
--Vangie
Armiger, Granddaughter of R. G. Finch